Skip to main content

Delegation Based DeFi (White paper)

(pfd version)


Thibaut Chessé ( ), Yves-Michel Leporcher (, Benoît Maïsseu (


This technical whitepaper establishes the main principles of a decentralized investment system using Tezos blockchain innovative mechanisms and an architecture of dedicated smart contracts. The main components of this system include the new Continuous Delegation Offering concept combined with a Continuous Security Reward allowing to consolidate the value of the investment token. Additionally, a Decentralized Autonomous Organization is used to overview the token governance. This decentralized structure can be used for any investment in the development of a project that will generate revenues in a way that allows a share of this revenue in tokens to be bought back or burned automatically thanks to a smart contract, thus sustaining the value of the investment token.


This document describes the architecture of Werenode’s proposed investment token contracts, including the contract that controls the emission of Werecoin itself (Werenode’s token) thanks to a specific concept of Tezos blockchain: the baking delegation [5]. We will also describe how the revenue flow is connected to the investment token and the smart contract that allows to manage the link with the revenues of the project for which the investment is gathered.

Investment token as a real instrument of trust#

Token fundraising is often associated with high-risk for investors. Furthermore, the decision makers are themselves rarely involved directly in the project, thus raising a critical question of trust. We propose a fully decentralized contract architecture to allow investors to secure their assets.

The architecture thereafter described is built to bring warranties to users regarding the project for which the funds are raised. These warranties ensure that no capital can be lost and consolidate the reward process thanks to the use of formally verified smart contracts.

Continuous Delegation Offering#

First and foremost, as an innovation, the Tezos tool of delegated baking is used to introduce safely the investment token. Indeed, thanks to the proof of stake consensus algorithm, Tezos owners can be rewarded when they lend their baking rights to another baker [3]. In exchange, the delegated baker will receive a part of the baking fee. As an example, Werenode, a member of Tezos baker community, will reward the owners of the tez which are delegated to itself with Werecoin tokens (WRC), hence introducing them. With this so-called Continuous Delegation Offerings (CDOs), it will be possible to introduce smoothly and progressively WRC, without any concentration and later dilution. This introduction mechanism requires that the financed services are bound to a baker setup. The native process of the Tezos baking protocol will serve to control the issuance, while contributing to the decentralization of the network [1].

Indeed, the reward for the delegation will be partly or totally paid to the owner of the tez in WRC. The ratio XTZ/WRC for the baking reward of the delegate can be chosen, depending on the delegate investment profile choice. In any case, the full liquidity and capital value of the delegated Tez is ensured. This allows a better control of investment risk and answers to the decentralized issuance need, which is one of the keys of a successful token introduction. Token issuance usually raises a risk of concentration but this process of emission guarantees a fair and transparent opportunity for potential stakeholders.

The market value of the WRC will be fixed by an automated market mechanism (whether an existing decentralized exchange like Dexter [2] or QuipuSwap or a new relevant comparable exchange). The emitted number of WRC for each cycle of delegation will be adjusted to the current WRC/XTZ value.

The amount of planned tokens for issuance has to be cautiously scheduled. It needs to be connected to the revenue that a tranche of investment is generating. Each time a new tranche of investment is created, the amount of token to be reissued, in relation with the planned investment revenue will be determined by a decentralized authority vote.

Continuous Delegation Offering mechanism

Continuous Security Reward#

A coin burning process will be implemented to strengthen the value of the token. The number of tokens that will be destroyed will be determined by an autonomous process linked to the actual activity of the collateral business. An innovative mechanism will be built in WRC token’s smart contract: each usage of WRC as traceability token or payment token will trigger the back reward of a percentage (n) of the value of the service tracked. This amount of WRC will be burnt.

This will allow to support the value of the token thus rewarding the investors, also protecting the token liquidity. This process as an enhanced extension of the Continuous Security Offering is more accurately named as a Continuous Security Reward system. This allows to ensure a second virtuous principle of consolidated added value for the token, also contributing to the Tezos ecosystem value.

Alternatively, instead of simply burning this percentage n of tokens, a larger amount of WRC could be bought back automatically at market price by the entity managing the revenue flow, with a fee used to reward the liquidity provider of the decentralized exchange mechanism

[4]. This would offer the additional advantage of supporting the decentralized exchange XTZ/WRC pair. But this alternate process could be used as long as it doesn’t reintroduce a risk of token accumulation endangering its market value. Indeed, in this case, the usual drawback would be to create a new reserve of tokens that could be sold too quickly (or could just create a distrust risk). Therefore it should be linked with a clear reintroduction process of the bought back tokens (through the redistribution of these tokens as fidelity tokens for example). Especially, if these bought back tokens are reintroduced thanks to a cashback mechanism towards the customer of the collateral service, this potential disadvantage would be negated. A cashback of the same percentage n would fully negate the potential reserve risk. A mixed strategy is also possible, with a bought back amount of tokens linked to the cashback percentage offered on the service and the excess tokens to be destroyed.

As traceability token (and marginally payment token), WRC measures all service flow and routes a n% for the reward mechanism:

Continuous Delegation Offering mechanism

This Continuous Security Reward (CSR) principle will provide warranties along the token life cycle, ensuring its sustainability and rewarding the token holders. Thanks to this smart contract architecture, the strengthening of the token will directly depend on the accumulated quality of the projects and allow to finance the new services to come, potentially benefiting from virtuous anticipations.

Rebate on services sold by the financed project#

The WRC token will be accepted as payment for the services proposed by the financed projects. For example, in our first implementation, Werecoins will be used for electric vehicles charging. The token will be accepted at current market value and give access to rebates on the collateral services. Of course, a marginal share of the payment is expected to be made directly in WRC, at least at the beginning of the process. Therefore, it’s important to keep in mind that the first usage of the token will be to give traceability, disintermediation and interoperability to all services for which decentralization can be beneficial. This is why the share of services not directly paid in WRC will be tracked proportionally thanks to the token, thus triggering the reward mechanism.

Yield opportunity thanks to DEX introduction#

The WRC will be tradable thanks to decentralized exchanges platforms or a new relevant comparable exchange. The XTZ/WRC pair will be the first proposed.

Decentralized Autonomous Organization#

A classical mechanism of Decentralized Autonomous Organization will be linked to the WRC token allowing a distributed governance to which proposals will be submitted and voted. Thanks to this Decentralized Token Management the main decision will be taken in the best interest of the investors and the financed projects. DAO decisions will typically be liquidity management and token life cycle (lock-up, burning, redeeming…). As an example, the votes of the decentralized autonomous organization will typically allow the adequate tuning of the share of project revenue that will be burned.

Iterative process for new investments#

The amount of value that is used to support the rate of the investment token (s) is accumulated. When this cumulative value ffs reaches the initial total investment I multiplied by p (p being a ROI) a landing process of the reward support to the token will be initiated, lowering progressively the percentage n.

As a general rule, the possible triggering conditions for the introduction of a new roll of tokens will be:

  1. The closure of the previous backward support process (pI has been reached)
  2. a partnership or investment tranche that opens a new market for the reward percentage flow
  3. the market value of WRC has already reached pI (∑ 𝑣 > 𝑝𝐼, v being the market value of the token)


DBDeFiDelegation Based Decentralized Financing
CDOContinuous Delegated Offering
CSOContinuous Security Offering
CSRContinuous Security Reward
DEXDecentralized EXchange
WRCWerecoin, an example of a token that would be emitted thanks to CDO
ROIReturn On Investment
DAODecentralized Autonomous Organization
XTZTezos coin


[1] Ariel Gabizon Iddo Bentov and Alex Mizrahi. Cryptocurrencies without proof of work. 2014.#

[2] Dexter Documentation. 2020.#

[3] Tezos Project. Formal specification of the tezos smart contract language. 2014.#

[4] Uniswap Project. Uniswap V2 Core. 2020.#

[5] ASCS on behalf of Tezos Foundation. Tezos Deep Dive Deck. 2020#


This paper is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any investment and should not be used in the evaluation of the merits of making any investment decision. It should not be relied upon for accounting, legal or tax advice or investment recommendations. This paper reflects current opinions of the authors and is not made on behalf of Werenode or its affiliates and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Werenode, its affiliates or individuals associated with Werenode. The opinions reflected herein are subject to change without being updated.